引用:
作者: 昏迷童子Sleepy
之但係steward開罰單時唔係吹shortcut獲利......
而係吹“不安全方式返回賽道”......
呢個先係咁多車手響Twitter鬧爆FIA的主因......
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/v...NoBpp5d6tRl4Mw
依當日台灣Fox Sports旁述所講...響冷氣房入面果五個stewards得一個有駕駛F1經驗......
果幾個人一係就根本唔明白百幾二百衝入草皮冇哂grip之下部車唔係踩多野brake就停到貼到左綫兼唔會甩埋牆......
一係就明知呢個問題...但係我唔理...我要你自炒都唔俾你返入黎......
更大鑊0既係之後Ricciardo仲要再補多刀...
“三年前火腿都係咁閘埋我度啦...點解果時唔罰0既?  ......”
亦因爲係咁...本童子先至咁覺果粒曾經做過車手的螺絲原來可以禮義廉到咁令人作嘔......  |
我當然唔明點解佢地有更好既理由, 偏偏只係講UNSAFE RELEASE就算啦
不過整件事來看, 如果VETTEL係之後肯讓位我覺得會好D, 當然爭緊第一邊個會肯讓位丫
官方既理據係咁寫:
The stewards reviewed video evidence and determined that Car 5,left the track at turn 3, rejoined the track at turn 4 in an unsafe manner and forced car 44 off track. Car 44 had to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
